Samstag, 30. Juni 2012
Freitag, 29. Juni 2012
Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2012
Jürgen Domian versteigert seinen alten 1LIVE-Moderationsstuhl ¿ Erlös geht an Zentrum für Palliativmedizin in Köln 28.06.2012 - WDR Presselounge
Jürgen Domian versteigert seinen alten 1LIVE-Moderationsstuhl ¿ Erlös geht an Zentrum für Palliativmedizin in Köln 28.06.2012 - WDR Presselounge
-
Domian mit Prof. Dr. Raymond Voltz, Direktor des Zentrums für Palliativmedizin (links)© WDR
1LIVE-Moderator Jürgen Domian hat dem Zentrum für Palliativmedizin der Uni-Klinik Köln einen Scheck in Höhe von 4155 Euro überreicht. Die Summe war bei der Versteigerung seines alten Moderationsstuhls erreicht worden, auf dem Domian zehn Jahre lang während seiner WDR-Telefon-Talk-Sendung gesessen hatte. Anlässlich des Umzuges von 1LIVE in die Innenstadt wurde das Sitzmöbel nun ausgetauscht.
Wie DOMIAN-Redakteur Marc Strucken erklärte, erreichten ihn anlässlich des Umzugs in das neue 1Live-Haus viele Anfragen von Fans der Sendung, die Teile des alten Mobiliars kaufen wollten. So entstand die Idee, den Stuhl für einen guten Zweck zu versteigern. Jürgen Domian entschied sich für das Dr. Mildred Scheel-Haus, so der Name des Palliativzentrums auf dem Gelände der Uni-Klinik Köln. Domian lobte die Arbeit des Hauses, in dem auch sein Vater vor einigen Jahren gestorben sei. Hier habe er eine sehr intensive und gute Betreuung von Patienten und Angehörigen erlebt und sei „beeindruckt, wie man hier mit Menschen in einer sehr schwierigen Situation umgehe“.
Prof. Dr. Edgar Schömig, Vorstandsvorsitzender und ärztlicher Direktor der Uni-Klinik Köln und Prof. Dr. Raymond Voltz, Direktor des Zentrums für Palliativmedizin, bedankten sich für den Scheck, der einmal mehr Ansporn für die Arbeit im Palliativzentrum sei.
Höchstbietender der Aktion und somit Spender der 4155 Euro ist Thomas Dünow aus Bonn. Als regelmäßiger DOMIAN-Zuschauer habe er schon länger etwas spenden wollen, deshalb habe er sich direkt entschieden mitzubieten. Den ersteigerten Stuhl will er jedoch nicht behalten, sondern gleich weiter versteigern: Der Erlös soll diesmal dem Tierheim in Troisdorf zugute kommen.
Jürgen Domian versteigert seinen alten 1LIVE-Moderationsstuhl ¿ Erlös geht an Zentrum für Palliativmedizin in Köln 28.06.2012 - WDR Presselounge
Domian mit Prof. Dr. Raymond Voltz, Direktor des Zentrums für Palliativmedizin (links)© WDR
1LIVE-Moderator Jürgen Domian hat dem Zentrum für Palliativmedizin der Uni-Klinik Köln einen Scheck in Höhe von 4155 Euro überreicht. Die Summe war bei der Versteigerung seines alten Moderationsstuhls erreicht worden, auf dem Domian zehn Jahre lang während seiner WDR-Telefon-Talk-Sendung gesessen hatte. Anlässlich des Umzuges von 1LIVE in die Innenstadt wurde das Sitzmöbel nun ausgetauscht.
Wie DOMIAN-Redakteur Marc Strucken erklärte, erreichten ihn anlässlich des Umzugs in das neue 1Live-Haus viele Anfragen von Fans der Sendung, die Teile des alten Mobiliars kaufen wollten. So entstand die Idee, den Stuhl für einen guten Zweck zu versteigern. Jürgen Domian entschied sich für das Dr. Mildred Scheel-Haus, so der Name des Palliativzentrums auf dem Gelände der Uni-Klinik Köln. Domian lobte die Arbeit des Hauses, in dem auch sein Vater vor einigen Jahren gestorben sei. Hier habe er eine sehr intensive und gute Betreuung von Patienten und Angehörigen erlebt und sei „beeindruckt, wie man hier mit Menschen in einer sehr schwierigen Situation umgehe“.
Prof. Dr. Edgar Schömig, Vorstandsvorsitzender und ärztlicher Direktor der Uni-Klinik Köln und Prof. Dr. Raymond Voltz, Direktor des Zentrums für Palliativmedizin, bedankten sich für den Scheck, der einmal mehr Ansporn für die Arbeit im Palliativzentrum sei.
Höchstbietender der Aktion und somit Spender der 4155 Euro ist Thomas Dünow aus Bonn. Als regelmäßiger DOMIAN-Zuschauer habe er schon länger etwas spenden wollen, deshalb habe er sich direkt entschieden mitzubieten. Den ersteigerten Stuhl will er jedoch nicht behalten, sondern gleich weiter versteigern: Der Erlös soll diesmal dem Tierheim in Troisdorf zugute kommen.
Dienstag, 26. Juni 2012
Samstag, 16. Juni 2012
Stand with President Obama: Pass the DREAM Act | DCCC
 |
BREAKING NEWS: President Obama just announced a long-overdue policy that gives legal status to young immigrants, including students and members of the military.
As the President put it, "It makes no sense to expel talented young persons who are, for all intents and purposes, Americans."
Republicans in Congress are already mobilizing against the President’s policy -- one has even announced a plan to sue the Obama administration.
We need to get the President’s back on this.
This momentous decision is a critical first step to addressing millions of young immigrants who have grown up in the United States -- but it’s only temporary. The next President could revoke this order on their first day in office.
Republicans in Congress must pass the DREAM Act to allow these students and members of our military a real pathway to citizenship. President Obama made it clear in his statement today:
“I’ve said time and time again to Congress: send me the DREAM Act, put it on my desk, and I’ll pass it right away.”
This is a defining issue for our country: if Mitt Romney and the Republicans refuse to allow immigrants who were brought to America as children to have basic rights, then we need to call them out.
Add your name right now:
Angela
Angela Guzman
DCCC Grassroots Outreach Director
Freitag, 15. Juni 2012
Media Advisory: You're Invited! Join Us for Virtual Office Hours on Rural Economic Issues and #AskUSDA
You're Invited! Join Us for Virtual Office Hours on Rural Economic Issues and #AskUSDA
WASHINGTON, June 14, 2012 – On TUESDAY, June 19, 2012, Deputy Under Secretary for Rural Development Doug O’Brien will host the June USDA virtual office hours on Twitter. O’Brien will discuss the Obama Administration’s efforts to create a rural America that’s built to last, through support of broadband, education, medical, and water quality projects. In many cases, USDA works in partnership with other government entities, including Tribes, and business development organizations to create job opportunities in rural America.
O’Brien will also discuss efforts by USDA to provide homeownership opportunities to limited-income rural residents and to help them refinance their homes to take advantage of historically low interest rates.
During the live Twitter chat, O’Brien will answer YOUR questions. Submit them in advance to the @USDA Twitter account using the hashtag #AskUSDA.
USDA Virtual Office Hours, a monthly live question and answer series allows stakeholders to directly engage with USDA leadership and subject matter experts through Twitter. Sessions will be focused on a specific mission, issue or program, as aligned with the Department’s strategic goals and based on stakeholder interests.
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
1:30 p.m. EDT
WHAT: Deputy Under Secretary for Rural Development Doug O’Brien will host June’s USDA Virtual Office Hours on Twitter. The topic of the discussion will be economic development in our nation’s rural communities and the important role housing plays in creating jobs, maintaining viable rural communities, and contributing to the economy.
WHERE: Tune in online by following @USDA and using #askUSDA.
Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2012
Dienstag, 12. Juni 2012
You could win dinner with Barack - Barack Obama
Helmut --
We're organizing another dinner with folks like you, and I hope you'll take me up on the offer.
Pitch in $3 or whatever you can today to be automatically entered to join me.
These dinners mean something more than just a meal among friends.
They represent the kind of politics we believe in. It's a simple but powerful idea: Everyone should have a seat at the table, no matter where you come from or how much you can afford to give.
The other side has special-interest allies lining up to tear us down.
I've got you.
These dinners are a small way for me to say thanks, so I'm saving you a seat.
Chip in what you can today and you'll be automatically entered to be there:
https://donate.barackobama.com/Meet-Me-for-Dinner
Thanks, for everything.
Barack
We're organizing another dinner with folks like you, and I hope you'll take me up on the offer.
Pitch in $3 or whatever you can today to be automatically entered to join me.
These dinners mean something more than just a meal among friends.
They represent the kind of politics we believe in. It's a simple but powerful idea: Everyone should have a seat at the table, no matter where you come from or how much you can afford to give.
The other side has special-interest allies lining up to tear us down.
I've got you.
These dinners are a small way for me to say thanks, so I'm saving you a seat.
Chip in what you can today and you'll be automatically entered to be there:
https://donate.barackobama.com/Meet-Me-for-Dinner
Thanks, for everything.
Barack
Montag, 11. Juni 2012
Sonntag, 10. Juni 2012
REGION STUTTGART: WIR SIND OBAMA
 |
Johann Conrad Wölflin, am 29. Januar 1729 im württembergischen Besigheim geboren und in Weinstadt-Beutelsbach aufgewachsen, ist Urgroßvater in sechster Generation von Barack Obama. Obamas Ur-Ur-Ur-Ur-Ur-Ur-Großvater wanderte 1750 aus, amerikanisierte seinen Nachnamen in Wolfley und gründete in Pennsylvania eine Familie, die in sechster Generation den heutigen US-Präsidenten Barack Obama hervorbrachte. |
G20 Mexico: Sitio Oficial de la Presidencia de México en el G-20
G20 Mexico: Sitio Oficial de la Presidencia de México en el G-20
We for Obama Barack Obama 2012 Europe Donate Today
Wir für Obama
We for Obama
This campaign will be funded by you and me -- real people giving what we can afford. But if we're going to win, we need to build a grassroots campaign that's bigger and stronger than anything we've built before. I've set a goal for how much I want to raise -- will you donate today to help me meet it?
Samstag, 9. Juni 2012
We for Obama Barack Obama 2012 Europe Donate Today
Wir für Obama
We for Obama
This campaign will be funded by you and me -- real people giving what we can afford. But if we're going to win, we need to build a grassroots campaign that's bigger and stronger than anything we've built before. I've set a goal for how much I want to raise -- will you donate today to help me meet it?
Wir für Obama Barack Obama 2012 Europe Donate Today
Wir für Obama
We for Obama
This campaign will be funded by you and me -- real people giving what we can afford. But if we're going to win, we need to build a grassroots campaign that's bigger and stronger than anything we've built before. I've set a goal for how much I want to raise -- will you donate today to help me meet it?
Remarks by President Obama at Press Conference on the Economy The White House
June 08, 2012
James S. Brady Press Briefing Room
10:40 A.M. EDT
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. I just want to say a few words about the economy, and then I will take some of your questions.
Today, we’re fighting back from the deepest economic crisis since the Great Depression.
After losing jobs for 25 months in a row, our businesses have now created jobs for 27 months in a row -- 4.3 million new jobs in all.
The fact is job growth in this recovery has been stronger than in the one following the last recession a decade ago.
But the hole we have to fill is much deeper and the global aftershocks are much greater. That’s why we've got to keep on pressing with actions that further strengthen the economy.
Right now, one concern is Europe, which faces a threat of renewed recession as countries deal with a financial crisis. Obviously this matters to us because Europe is our largest economic trading partner. If there’s less demand for our products in places like Paris or Madrid it could mean less businesses -- or less business for manufacturers in places like Pittsburgh or Milwaukee.
The good news is there is a path out of this challenge. These decisions are fundamentally in the hands of Europe’s leaders, and fortunately, they understand the seriousness of the situation and the urgent need to act. I’ve been in frequent contact with them over the past several weeks, and we know that there are specific steps they can take right now to prevent the situation there from getting worse.
In the short term, they’ve got to stabilize their financial system. And part of that is taking clear action as soon as possible to inject capital into weak banks. Just as important, leaders can lay out a framework and a vision for a stronger eurozone, including deeper collaboration on budgets and banking policy. Getting there is going to take some time, but showing the political commitment to share the benefits and responsibilities of a integrated Europe will be a strong step.
With respect to Greece, which has important elections next weekend, we’ve said that it is in everybody’s interest for Greece to remain in the eurozone while respecting its commitments to reform. We recognize the sacrifices that the Greek people have made, and European leaders understand the need to provide support if the Greek people choose to remain in the eurozone. But the Greek people also need to recognize that their hardships will likely be worse if they choose to exit from the eurozone.
Over the longer term, even as European countries with large debt burdens carry out necessary fiscal reforms, they’ve also got to promote economic growth and job creation. As some countries have discovered, it’s a lot harder to rein in deficits and debt if your economy isn’t growing. So it’s a positive thing that the conversation has moved in that direction, and leaders like Angela Merkel and Francois Hollande are working to put in place a growth agenda alongside responsible fiscal plans.
The bottom line is the solutions to these problems are hard, but there are solutions. The decisions required are tough, but Europe has the capacity to make them. And they have America’s support. Their success is good for us. And the sooner that they act, and the more decisive and concrete their actions, the sooner people and markets will regain some confidence and the cheaper the costs of cleanup will be down the road.
In the meantime, given the signs of weakness in the world economy, not just in Europe but also some softening in Asia, it's critical that we take the actions we can to strengthen the American economy right now.
Last September, I sent Congress a detailed jobs plan full of the kind of bipartisan ideas that would have put more Americans back to work. It had broad support from the American people. It was fully paid for. If Congress had passed it in full, we’d be on track to have a million more Americans working this year. The unemployment rate would be lower. Our economy would be stronger.
Of course, Congress refused to pass this jobs plan in full. They did act on a few parts of the bill -- most significantly the payroll tax cut that’s putting more money in every working person’s paycheck right now. And I appreciate them taking that action. But they left most of the jobs plan just sitting there. And in light of the headwinds that we’re facing right now, I urge them to reconsider. Because there's steps we can take right now to put more people back to work. They’re not just my ideas; they're not just Democratic ideas -- they’re ideas that independent, nonpartisan economists believe would make a real difference in our economy.
Keep in mind that the private sector has been hiring at a solid pace over the last 27 months. But one of the biggest weaknesses has been state and local governments, which have laid off 450,000 Americans. These are teachers and cops and firefighters. Congress should pass a bill putting them back to work right now, giving help to the states so that those layoffs are not occurring.
In addition, since the housing bubble burst, we’ve got more than a million construction workers out of work. There’s nothing fiscally responsible about waiting to fix your roof until it caves in. We've got a lot of deferred maintenance in this country. We could be putting a lot of people back to work rebuilding our roads, our bridges, some of our schools. There's work to be done; there are workers to do it. Let’s put them back to work right now.
The housing market is stabilizing and beginning to come back in many parts of the country. But there are still millions of responsible homeowners who've done everything right but still struggle to make ends meet. So, as I talked about just a few weeks ago, let’s pass a bill that gives them a chance to save an average of $3,000 a year by refinancing their mortgage and taking advantage of these historically low rates. That's something we can do right now. It would make a difference.
Instead of just talking a good game about job creators, Congress should give the small business owners that actually create most of the new jobs in America a tax break for hiring more workers.
These are ideas that, again, have gotten strong validation from independent, nonpartisan economists. It would make a difference in our economy. And there's no excuse for not passing these ideas. We know they can work.
Now, if Congress decides, despite all that, that they aren’t going to do anything about this simply because it’s an election year, then they should explain to the American people why. There’s going to be plenty of time to debate our respective plans for the future. That’s a debate I’m eager to have. But right now, people in this town should be focused on doing everything we can to keep our recovery going and keeping our country strong. And that requires some action on the part of Congress. So I would urge them to take another look at some of the ideas that have already been put forward.
And with that, I'm going to take a couple of questions. And I'm going to start with Caren Bohan -- who is with Reuters, but as we all know, is about to go get a fancy job with National Journal. (Laughter.) And we're very proud of her. So congratulations to you, Caren. You get the first crack at me.
Q Thank you very much, Mr. President. Could you tell the American people what role the United States is playing in the European debt crisis? And also, do you think European leaders have a handle on what’s needed to stem the crisis? And finally, you talked about a number of ideas that you’ve already put forth to shield the American economy. Do you plan to give a speech or lay out additional ideas now that the crisis is really escalating?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, a couple of things. First of all, the situation in Europe is not simply a debt crisis. You’ve got some countries like Greece that genuinely have spent more than they’re bringing in, and they’ve got problems. There are other countries that actually were running a surplus and had fairly responsible fiscal policies but had weaknesses similar to what happened here with respect to their housing market or the real estate markets, and that has weakened their financial system. So there are a bunch of different issues going on in Europe. It’s not simply a debt crisis.
What is true is, is that the markets getting nervous have started making it much more expensive for them to borrow, and that then gets them on a downward spiral.
We have been in constant contact with Europe over the last -- European leaders over the last two years, and we have consulted with them both at the head of government and head of state level. I frequently speak to the leaders not only at formal settings like the G8 but also on the telephone or via videoconference. And our economic teams have gone over there to consult.
As I said in my opening remarks, the challenges they face are solvable. Right now, their focus has to be on strengthening their overall banking system -- much in the same way that we did back in 2009 and 2010 -- making a series of decisive actions that give people confidence that the banking system is solid, that capital requirements are being met, that various stresses that may be out there can be absorbed by the system. And I think that European leaders are in discussions about that and they’re moving in the right direction.
In addition, they’re going to have to look at how do they achieve growth at the same time as they’re carrying out structural reforms that may take two or three or five years to fully accomplish. So countries like Spain and Italy, for example, have embarked on some smart structural reforms that everybody thinks are necessary -- everything from tax collection to labor markets to a whole host of different issues. But they've got to have the time and the space for those steps to succeed. And if they are just cutting and cutting and cutting, and their unemployment rate is going up and up and up, and people are pulling back further from spending money because they're feeling a lot of pressure -- ironically, that can actually make it harder for them to carry out some of these reforms over the long term.
So I think there's discussion now about, in addition to sensible ways to deal with debt and government finances, there's a parallel discussion that's taking place among European leaders to figure out how do we also encourage growth and show some flexibility to allow some of these reforms to really take root.
Now, keep in mind that this obviously can have a potential impact on us because Europe is our largest trading partner. The good news is, is that a lot of the work we did back in 2009 and 2010 have put our financial system on a much more solid footing. Our insistence of increasing capital requirements for banks means that they can absorb some of the shocks that might come from across the Atlantic. Folks in the financial sector have been monitoring this carefully and I think are prepared for a range of contingencies.
But even if we weren't directly hit in the sense that our financial system still stayed solid, if Europe goes into a recession that means we're selling fewer goods, fewer services, and that is going to have some impact on the pace of our recovery. So we want to do everything we can to make sure that we are supportive of what European leaders are talking about. Ultimately, it is a decision that they've got to make in terms of how they move forward towards more integration, how they move forward in terms of accommodating the needs for both reform and growth.
And the most important thing I think we can do is make sure that we continue to have a strong, robust recovery. So the steps that I've outlined are the ones that are needed. We've got a couple of sectors in our economy that are still weak. Overall, the private sector has been doing a good job creating jobs. We've seen record profits in the corporate sector.
The big challenge we have in our economy right now is state and local government hiring has been going in the wrong direction. You've seen teacher layoffs, police officers, cops, firefighters being laid off. And the other sector that's still weak has been the construction industry. Those two areas we've directly addressed with our jobs plan. The problem is that it requires Congress to take action, and we're going to keep pushing them to see if they can move in that direction.
Jackie Calmes. Where did Jackie go? There she is.
Q Thank you, Mr. President. I'd like to ask you a couple -- about what a couple of other people have said about Europe. And one is that I'd like to know if you agree with former President Bill Clinton, who said in the past week that the European's policies that you've described here today are much like those of the Republicans in this country -- politics of austerity that would take us in the same direction as Europe -- if you agree with that. The Republicans, for their part, have said that you're simply blaming the Europeans for problems that have been caused by your own policies. So I'd like you to respond to both of those. And also, tell us precisely how much time you personally spend on the European situation.
THE PRESIDENT: Any other aspects to the question? (Laughter.)
Q I do have more questions. (Laughter.)
Q Is she going to National Journal? (Laughter.)
THE PRESIDENT: First of all, in terms of the amount of time I spend -- look, I think it's fair to say that over the last two years I'm in consistent discussions with European leadership and consistent discussions with my economic team.
This is one of the things that's changed in the world economy over the last two or three decades, is that this is a global economy now, and what happens anywhere in the world can have an impact here in the United States. Certainly that's true after the kind of trauma that we saw in 2008 and 2009.
And if you think about the situation in Europe, they're going through a lot of the things that we went through back in 2009, 2010, where we took some very decisive action. The challenge they have is they’ve got 17 governments that have to coordinate -- 27 if you count the entire European Union, not just the eurozone. So imagine dealing with 17 Congresses instead of just one. That makes things more challenging.
But what we’ve tried to do is to be constructive, to not frame this as us scolding them or telling them what to do, but to give them advice, in part based on our experiences here in having stabilized a financial situation effectively. And ultimately, though, they're going to have to make a lot of these decisions, and so what we can do is to prod, advise, suggest. But ultimately, they're going to have to make these decisions.
Now, in terms of characterizing the situation over there, what is absolutely true -- this is true in Europe and it’s true here in the United States -- is that we’ve got short-term problems and long-term problems. And the short-term problems are: How do we put people back to work? How do we make the economy grow as rapidly as possible? How do we ensure that the recovery gains momentum?
Because if we do those things, not only is it good for the people who find work, not only is it good for families who are able to pay the bills, but it actually is one of the most important things we can do to reduce deficits and debt. It’s a lot easier to deal with deficits and debt if you’re growing, because you’re bringing in more revenue and you’re not spending as much because people don't need unemployment insurance as much; they don't need other programs that are providing support to people in need because things are going pretty good.
Now, that's true here in the United States, and that's true in Europe. So the problem I think President Clinton identified is that if, when an economy is still weak and a recovery is still fragile, that you resort to a strategy of "let’s cut more" -- so that you’re seeing government layoffs, reductions in government spending, severe cutbacks in major investments that help the economy grow over the long term -- if you’re doing all those things at the same time as consumers are pulling back because they're still trying to pay off credit card debt, and there’s generally weak demand in the economy as a whole, then you can get on a downward spiral where everybody is pulling back at the same time. That weakens demand and that further crimps the desire of companies to hire more people. And that's the pattern that Europe is in danger of getting into.
Some countries in Europe right now have an unemployment rate of 15, 20 percent. If you are engaging in too much austerity too quickly, and that unemployment rate goes up to 20 or 25 percent, then that actually makes it harder to then pay off your debts. And the markets, by the way, respond in -- when they see this kind of downward spiral happening, they start making a calculation, well, if you’re not growing at all, if you’re contracting, you may end up having more trouble paying us off, so we’re going to charge you even more. Your interest rates will go up. And it makes it that much tougher.
So I think that -- what we want both for ourselves, but what we’ve advised in Europe as well is a strategy that says let’s do everything can to grow now, even as we lock in a long-term plan to stabilize our debt and our deficits, and start bringing them down in a steady, sensible way.
And by the way, that’s what we proposed last year; that’s what’s proposed in my budget. What I’ve said is, let’s make long-term spending cuts; let’s initiate long-term reforms; let’s reduce our health care spending; let’s make sure that we’ve got a pathway, a glide-path to fiscal responsibility, but at the same time, let’s not underinvest in the things that we need to do right now to grow. And that recipe of short-term investments in growth and jobs with a long-term path of fiscal responsibility is the right approach to take for, I think, not only the United States but also for Europe.
Q What about the Republicans saying that you’re blaming the Europeans for the failures of your own policies?
THE PRESIDENT: The truth of the matter is that, as I said, we’ve created 4.3 million jobs over the last 27 months, over 800,000 just this year alone. The private sector is doing fine. Where we’re seeing weaknesses in our economy have to do with state and local government -- oftentimes, cuts initiated by governors or mayors who are not getting the kind of help that they have in the past from the federal government and who don’t have the same kind of flexibility as the federal government in dealing with fewer revenues coming in.
And so, if Republicans want to be helpful, if they really want to move forward and put people back to work, what they should be thinking about is, how do we help state and local governments and how do we help the construction industry. Because the recipes that they’re promoting are basically the kinds of policies that would add weakness to the economy, would result in further layoffs, would not provide relief in the housing market, and would result, I think most economists estimate, in lower growth and fewer jobs, not more.
All right. David Jackson.
Q Thank you, sir. There are a couple of books out with, essentially, details about national security issues. There are reports of terrorist kill lists that you supervise and there are reports of cyber-attacks on the Iranian nuclear program that you ordered. Two things. First of all, what’s your reaction of this information getting out in public? And secondly, what’s your reaction to lawmakers who accuse your team of leaking these details in order to promote your reelection bid?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, first of all, I’m not going to comment on the details of what are supposed to be classified items. Second, as Commander-in-Chief, the issues that you have mentioned touch on our national security, touch on critical issues of war and peace, and they're classified for a reason -- because they're sensitive and because the people involved may, in some cases, be in danger if they're carrying out some of these missions. And when this information, or reports, whether true or false, surface on the front page of newspapers, that makes the job of folks on the front lines tougher and it makes my job tougher -- which is why since I've been in office, my attitude has been zero tolerance for these kinds of leaks and speculation.
Now, we have mechanisms in place where if we can root out folks who have leaked, they will suffer consequences. In some cases, it's criminal -- these are criminal acts when they release information like this. And we will conduct thorough investigations, as we have in the past.
The notion that my White House would purposely release classified national security information is offensive. It's wrong. And people I think need to have a better sense of how I approach this office and how the people around me here approach this office.
We're dealing with issues that can touch on the safety and security of the American people, our families, or our military personnel, or our allies. And so we don’t play with that. And it is a source of consistent frustration, not just for my administration but for previous administrations, when this stuff happens. And we will continue to let everybody know in government, or after they leave government, that they have certain obligations that they should carry out.
But as I think has been indicated from these articles, whether or not the information they've received is true, the writers of these articles have all stated unequivocally that they didn't come from this White House. And that's not how we operate.
Q Are there leak investigations going on now -- is that what you're saying?
THE PRESIDENT: What I'm saying is, is that we consistently, whenever there is classified information that is put out into the public, we try to find out where that came from.
Okay? Thank you very much, everybody. Thank you.
END
11:09 A.M. EDT
Freitag, 8. Juni 2012
Donnerstag, 7. Juni 2012
U.S: Federal Reserve FRB: June 7, 2012 - Notice of Open Board Meeting(s)
Federal Reserve FRB: June 7, 2012 - Notice of Open Board Meeting(s)
- Agency:
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
- Time, date:
- 3:30 PM, Thursday, June 7, 2012
- Place:
- Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th Street entrance between Constitution Avenue and C Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551
- Status:
- Open
Watch live here
On the day of the meeting, you will be able to view the meeting via webcast from a link available on the Board’s public website. You do not need to register to view the webcast of the meeting. A link to the meeting documentation will also be available approximately 20 minutes before the start of the meeting. Both links may be accessed from the Board’s public website at
If you plan to attend the open meeting in person, we ask that you notify us in advance and provide your name, date of birth, and social security number (SSN) or passport number. You may provide this information by calling (202) 452-2474 or you may register online. You may pre-register until close of business June 6, 2012. You also will be asked to provide identifying information, including a photo ID, before being admitted to the Board meeting. The Public Affairs Office must approve the use of cameras; please call 202-452-2955 for further information. If you need an accommodation for a disability, please contact Penelope Beattie on 202-452-3982. For the hearing impaired only, please use the Telecommunication Device for the Deaf (TDD) on 202-263-4869.
Privacy Act Notice: The information you provide will be used to assist us in prescreening you to ensure the security of the Board’s premises and personnel. In order to do this, we may disclose your information consistent with the routine uses listed in the Privacy Act Notice for BGFRS-32, including to appropriate federal, state, local, or foreign agencies where disclosure is reasonably necessary to determine whether you pose a security risk or where the security or confidentiality of your information has been compromised. We are authorized to collect your information by 12 U.S.C §§ 243 and 248, and Executive Order 9397. In accordance with Executive Order 9397, we collect your SSN so that we can keep accurate records, because other people may have the same name and birth date. In addition, we use your SSN when we make requests for information about you from law enforcement and other regulatory agency databases. Furnishing the information requested is voluntary; however, your failure to provide any of the information requested may result in disapproval of your request for access to the Board’s premises. You may be subject to a fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C § 1001 for any false statements you make in your request to enter the Board’s premises.
| Matters to be Considered: | ||
|---|---|---|
| Discussion Agenda: | ||
| 1. | Proposed interagency rulemakings: strengthening and harmonizing the regulatory capital framework for banking organizations, including proposed rules for implementing Basel III for banking organizations and proposed consolidated capital requirements for savings and loan holding companies. | |
| 2. | Final interagency rulemaking: market risk capital rule. | |
Notes:
- The staff memo to the Board will be made available to the public on the day of the meeting in paper and the background material will be made available on a compact disc (CD). If you require a paper copy of the entire document, please call Penelope Beattie on 202-452-3982. The documentation will not be available until about 20 minutes before the start of the meeting.
- This meeting will be webcast and also available on-demand after the event for the benefit of those unable to attend.
Computer discs (CD's) will then be available for listening in the Board's Freedom of Information Office, and copies may be ordered for $4 per disc by calling 202-452-3684 or by writing to:
Freedom of Information Office
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Washington, D.C. 20551
For more information please contact: Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-2955.
Supplementary Information: You may call 202-452-3206 for a recorded announcement of this meeting; or you may contact the Board’s public website at www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement. (The website also includes procedural and other information about the open meeting.)
Dated: 5/30/2012Jennifer J. Johnson ,
Secretary of the Board.
Last update: May 30, 2012
Mittwoch, 6. Juni 2012
Dienstag, 5. Juni 2012
Klaus Bednarz wird 70 - Piel: „Vorbild für kritischen, unerschrockenen Journalismus“
 |
| Klaus Bednarz |
Am 06. Juni 2012 wird Klaus Bednarz, ehemaliger ARD-Korrespondent, langjähriger Leiter und Moderator des ARD-Magazins „Monitor“ und Autor zahlreicher Reisereportagen, 70 Jahre alt.
Intendantin Monika Piel: „ Der Macher, der Mahner, der Moderator, der Menschenrechtler. Klaus Bednarz hat seinen Sinn für Gerechtigkeit nach innen und außen unbeirrbar bewiesen, meist streng und oft unbequem gegenüber Autoritäten. Für viele ist Klaus Bednarz eine Referenzgröße geblieben und in der Öffentlichkeit ein Vorbild für einen kritischen, unerschrockenen Journalismus.“
Als Korrespondent aus Warschau und Moskau widmete er sich Fragen des Kalten Krieges und der Versöhnung mit Polen.
„Millionen Zuschauerinnen und Zuschauer erinnern sich an die tiefen Einblicke in den real existierenden Sozialismus, die er dem Fernsehpublikum bot, in einer Zeit als die Arbeitsbedingungen für Journalisten in einem solchen Land noch unendlich schwer waren,“ so Piel weiter.
Einer breiten Öffentlichkeit wurde Bednarz durch die Moderation des ARD-Politikmagazins „Monitor“ bekannt (1983 – 2001), dessen Redaktion er fast 20 Jahre leitete.
Im Anschluss war er bis zu seiner Pensionierung als WDR-Chefreporter u.a. für die Realisierung großer Dokumentarfilmprojekte über Ostpreußen, Sibirien, Patagonien und Karelien zuständig und ARD-Sonderkorrespondent in Russland.
Im Anschluss war er bis zu seiner Pensionierung als WDR-Chefreporter u.a. für die Realisierung großer Dokumentarfilmprojekte über Ostpreußen, Sibirien, Patagonien und Karelien zuständig und ARD-Sonderkorrespondent in Russland.
Klaus Bednarz wurde am 6. Juni 1942 in Falkensee/Berlin geboren.
Er war der erste ARD-Fernsehkorrespondent in Warschau und gründete das dortige ARD-Studio.
Außerdem war er ARD-Korrespondent und Leiter des ARD-Studios Moskau.
Von Dezember 1983 bis Dezember 2001 war Moderator des renommierten ARD-Magazins „Monitor“, dessen Redaktion er auch leitete.
Außerdem war er ständiger Kommentator der ARD-Tagesthemen. Von Januar 2002 bis zu seiner Pensionierung im Juni 2007 war Klaus Bednarz WDR-Chefreporter und ARD-Sonderkorrespondent.
Er war der erste ARD-Fernsehkorrespondent in Warschau und gründete das dortige ARD-Studio.
Außerdem war er ARD-Korrespondent und Leiter des ARD-Studios Moskau.
Von Dezember 1983 bis Dezember 2001 war Moderator des renommierten ARD-Magazins „Monitor“, dessen Redaktion er auch leitete.
Außerdem war er ständiger Kommentator der ARD-Tagesthemen. Von Januar 2002 bis zu seiner Pensionierung im Juni 2007 war Klaus Bednarz WDR-Chefreporter und ARD-Sonderkorrespondent.
Interview mit US-Botschafter Murphy zu 65 Jahre Marshall Plan : „Deutschland muss Motor bleiben“ | Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (SPD)
(Bild: dpa)
von Jochen Wiemken Berlin 5. Juni 2012
Vor 65 Jahren wurde der Marshallplan vorgestellt, ohne den Europa heute anders aussähe. Für US-Botschafter Philip D. Murphy in Berlin war das „die wichtigste diplomatische Initiative in der Geschichte der Menschheit“, wie er im Gespräch mit SPD.de verrät. Zusammen mit dem German Marshall Fund feiert die US-Botschaft heute (6. Juni 2012) das Jubiläum im Willy-Brandt-Haus.
Am 5. Juni 1947 schlug der amerikanische Außenminister George C. Marshall ein Wirtschaftsaufbauprogramm für Europa vor.
Mit dem „Marshallplan“ sollte nicht nur das kriegszerstörte Europa wieder aufgebaut werden, auch ein friedliches, geeintes Europa war eines der Ziele.
25 Jahre später bedankte sich Bundeskanzler Willy Brandt (SPD) mit der Einrichtung des „German Marshall Funds“.
Ziel der Stiftung ist es, die Beziehungen zwischen Europa und Amerika dauerhaft zu stärken.
Am Dienstag, den 5. Juni 2012, feiern der „German Marshall Fund“ zusammen mit der "Jungen Deutschen Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik e.V." (DGAP) und der Botschaft der Vereinigten Staaten im Willy-Brandt-Haus den 65. Jahrestag des Marshall Plans und das 40. Gründungsjahr des German Marshall Fund.
SPD.de sprach mit Philip D. Murphy, dem Botschafter der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika in Deutschland, über das heutige Verhältnis von Europa und den USA.
SPD.de:
Herr Botschafter, heute vor 65 Jahren wurde der Marshallplan vorgestellt. Durch ihn konnte sich Westeuropa aus den Trümmern des Zweiten Weltkriegs erheben. Während US-Präsident Obama von den Europäern fordert, mehr für das Wirtschaftswachstum zu tun, hat sich Bundeskanzlerin Merkel bisher auf strikte Haushaltsdisziplin als Mittel gegen die Krise verlassen. Muss es für Europa, muss es für Südeuropa so etwas wie einen zweiten Marshallplan geben?
Auch in Recklinghausen half der Marshallplan "zur Stärkung der freien Welt". Mit dem Wirtschaftshilfeprogramm verfolgten die USA drei Ziele: Überwindung von Hunger und Zerstörung, Aufbau von Handelspartnern und Eindämmung des Kommunismus. (Bild: Bundesarchiv, Bild 183-20671-0014 / CC-BY-SA)
U.S. Botschafter Philip D. Murphy:
Die vielleicht berühmteste und sicherlich einflussreichste Rede bei einer Abschlussfeier war die Rede von Außenminister George C. Marshall an der Harvard University am 5. Juni 1947.
In dieser Rede kündigte er einen Plan über wirtschaftliche Hilfe für die im Zweiten Weltkrieg zerstörten Länder Europas an.
An diesem Junimorgen in Harvard und anschließend auch andernorts in den Vereinigten Staaten erklärte er, warum es im Interesse des kriegsmüden Amerika sei, dem vom Krieg verwüsteten Europa beim Wiederaufbau zu helfen.
Das allein war schon bedeutend, aber was den Marshallplan – der meines Erachtens die wichtigste diplomatische Initiative in der Geschichte der Menschheit ist – so revolutionär machte, war der Beginn einer völlig neuen Art der wirtschaftlichen und politischen Zusammenarbeit.
Die Zusammenarbeit der 17 Länder, die der Einladung zur Teilnahme Folge leisteten, war eine Voraussetzung.
Viele Länder waren zurückhaltend, was die Erlaubnis einer uneingeschränkten Partnerschaft Deutschlands mit dem Westen anging.
Aber die widrigen Bedingungen im Nachkriegseuropa und die Logik der Wiederaufbaupläne überzeugte sie davon, wie wichtig Einigkeit war.
Und was war das Ergebnis?
Europa hat sich von einem von Krieg und Zwietracht zerrissenen Kontinent zu einer Union von Ländern und Idealen entwickelt, die sich für eine Welt mit mehr Sicherheit, Demokratie und Wohlstand einsetzen.
Heute ist das Wort Marshallplan ein Synonym für Erfolg. Aber wenn heute ein Marshallplan für den Nahen Osten, den arabischen Frühling oder sogar Südeuropa gefordert wird, ist das kein Ruf nach Finanzspritzen.
Ich denke, es ist der Ruf nach dem Modell für Zusammenarbeit und gemeinsames Handeln, für das der Marshallplan steht.
SPD.de:
Im Vergleich zu anderen Ländern in Europa geht es Deutschland in dieser Krise gut. Hat Amerika spezielle Wünsche an die Deutschen?
U.S. Botschafter Philip D. Murphy:
Die Forderungen von Bundeskanzlerin Merkel nach „mehr Europa“ und weiteren Fortschritten in Richtung einer politischen Union spiegeln den Geist des Marshallplans wider.
Durch den Marshallplan waren die Länder Europas angehalten, zusammenzuarbeiten und eine langfristige Lösung auszuarbeiten, die einen von Krieg und Diktatur zerrütteten Kontinent zu Demokratie, Frieden und Wohlstand führen würde.
Das 21. Jahrhundert hat neue Herausforderungen mit sich gebracht. Deutschland muss als eines der stärksten und führenden Länder Europas mit seinem starken Exportsektor und seiner wachsenden Volkswirtschaft der Motor der europäischen Krisenpolitik bleiben.
Das bedeutet die Ausarbeitung konkreter und erreichbarer Schritte für die Rahmenbedingungen des 21. Jahrhunderts. Genau darum geht es bei der Verpflichtung zu europäischer Solidarität.
SPD.de
Wie sehen Sie das Verhältnis zwischen Europa und den USA heute? Entfernt sich Amerika von Europa? Wendet es sich stärker dem Pazifik zu?
U.S. Botschafter Philip D. Murphy:
Die transatlantischen Beziehungen sind ein Vorbild für die ganze Welt – und ein Vorbild für die amerikanische Diplomatie von Präsident Obama und US-Außenministerin Clinton im transpazifischen Raum.
Europa bleibt der Eckpfeiler des weltweiten amerikanischen Engagements.
Die stärksten Partner der Vereinigten Staaten für die Bewältigung der schwierigen globalen Herausforderungen, vor denen die Welt steht, befinden sich genau hier in Europa.
In den vergangenen 65 Jahren wurden die Verbindungen zwischen der Europäischen Union und den Vereinigten Staaten gestärkt, indem wir gemeinsam daran gearbeitet haben, die Lehren von Freiheit und Demokratie zu fördern. Unsere gemeinsamen Werte und Interessen zum Wohle einer friedlicheren Welt haben ihre Wurzeln in der reichen Geschichte unserer transatlantischen Partnerschaft.
Wir streben nicht nur mit Deutschland, Frankreich und allen unseren europäischen Partnern dasselbe tiefgehende und umfassende Engagement an, sondern auch mit anderen Ländern auf der Welt.
Warum?
Weil wir wissen, dass unser aller Zukunft davon abhängt.
Video Founding GMF: How GMF Grew from an Idea to an Institution
The Birth of GMF(German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF))
Abonnieren
Posts (Atom)